While I obviously do not disagree that they are deranged and lunatic, why _you_ will lose is because you care about 'claims of morality' or 'rights' to rule.
Those who rule, rule. And you aren't one of them. They rule by conquest and inheritance. That's it.
Until very recently I thought hatred was compatible with good strategic sense in this conflict, but I'm not so sure anymore. You're a good example of the incompatibility - hatred clouds your judgment, makes you yell and scream in anger, signaling powerlessness and empty bravado. Thinking that morality has anything whatsoever to do with our situation.
Well put, but most of these low-church conservatives won't get it. They're too addicted to the thymos of relevance, whether it's within the comfortable conservative political system, or on Twitter owning the libtards, or prepping for a conflict that will never come.
Are you Amish or Mormon? Do explain this replacement strategy. BTW as BAP has explained a few times, fecundity is no guarantee of winning - fecund tribes can remain under the cultural and political authority of enemies as 'dhimmis'.
I too went to their schools and have a decent enough position in their institutions. Most of them think they are doing good, and are moral people. They think the rest of us are immoral, feral monsters. Bryan Caplan said and I agree, that most people are sincere.
Curtis is not 'advocating for' them. He doesn't need to. He's trying to get you and others to understand that your rage is not the path to victory, as you're the underdog. Your rage is simply making you stupid which is what rage does.
Okay, I'm trying to understand your point of view.
Are you against the 'dark elves' strategy of elite seduction? Because this has been Curtis' strategy for 15 years - from 2007. If so, this is a fundamental disagreement and you shouldn't be surprised at it in 2022. I suspect though that you haven't really followed through his argument - of why his analysis necessitates this particular strategy and how nothing else is in the cards if you wish to win.
You're mad because....people meet up in LA or NYC?
You think banker and wall street fucks are in charge?
What will you do with money and a high position? Are you running a 'reverse march through the institutions strategy'? Because that's bound to fail as well. Curtis has written about it on this very site.
I'm starting to wonder if you've read _any_ Moldbug at all beyond a few posts on Gray mirror.
Your worldview appears to be that of a 2005-era Dixie democrat.
I was at the NYC event week. Everyone I met there were very cool and very based. I don't think your geocentric basis for enemy territory is the litmus test you think it to be. Ironically I flew in from Louisiana for the event, and lots of people came from rural trump voting Red States.
When Yarvin says do nothing, I believe he is saying "Don't chimp out and shoot up a grocery store". My understanding with regard to his argument about the overturn of Roe Vs Wade is that the court should have waited until after the next election to not just overturn it, but to basically rewrite the constitution to be what ever they want it to be. As they did it right before the midterms, it's going to juice the Left and make it harder for the Right to retake the house and senate. Same way the Trump getting elected tripled the failing New York Times subscription revenue.
And hey no joke, if you want to go read an incredible writer whose politcal views align almost exactly with yours, (from what I can tell) go read Sanction by Roman McCoy. Good luck finding a copy of it though.
This is why you will remain a peasant.
While I obviously do not disagree that they are deranged and lunatic, why _you_ will lose is because you care about 'claims of morality' or 'rights' to rule.
Those who rule, rule. And you aren't one of them. They rule by conquest and inheritance. That's it.
Until very recently I thought hatred was compatible with good strategic sense in this conflict, but I'm not so sure anymore. You're a good example of the incompatibility - hatred clouds your judgment, makes you yell and scream in anger, signaling powerlessness and empty bravado. Thinking that morality has anything whatsoever to do with our situation.
Take the clear pill, first.
Well put, but most of these low-church conservatives won't get it. They're too addicted to the thymos of relevance, whether it's within the comfortable conservative political system, or on Twitter owning the libtards, or prepping for a conflict that will never come.
Thus they will never live freely.
Are you Amish or Mormon? Do explain this replacement strategy. BTW as BAP has explained a few times, fecundity is no guarantee of winning - fecund tribes can remain under the cultural and political authority of enemies as 'dhimmis'.
I too went to their schools and have a decent enough position in their institutions. Most of them think they are doing good, and are moral people. They think the rest of us are immoral, feral monsters. Bryan Caplan said and I agree, that most people are sincere.
Curtis is not 'advocating for' them. He doesn't need to. He's trying to get you and others to understand that your rage is not the path to victory, as you're the underdog. Your rage is simply making you stupid which is what rage does.
Clear Pill or bust, as a first step.
Okay, I'm trying to understand your point of view.
Are you against the 'dark elves' strategy of elite seduction? Because this has been Curtis' strategy for 15 years - from 2007. If so, this is a fundamental disagreement and you shouldn't be surprised at it in 2022. I suspect though that you haven't really followed through his argument - of why his analysis necessitates this particular strategy and how nothing else is in the cards if you wish to win.
You're mad because....people meet up in LA or NYC?
What are dissident territories?
What's your plan of action for victory?
You think banker and wall street fucks are in charge?
What will you do with money and a high position? Are you running a 'reverse march through the institutions strategy'? Because that's bound to fail as well. Curtis has written about it on this very site.
I'm starting to wonder if you've read _any_ Moldbug at all beyond a few posts on Gray mirror.
Your worldview appears to be that of a 2005-era Dixie democrat.
I was at the NYC event week. Everyone I met there were very cool and very based. I don't think your geocentric basis for enemy territory is the litmus test you think it to be. Ironically I flew in from Louisiana for the event, and lots of people came from rural trump voting Red States.
When Yarvin says do nothing, I believe he is saying "Don't chimp out and shoot up a grocery store". My understanding with regard to his argument about the overturn of Roe Vs Wade is that the court should have waited until after the next election to not just overturn it, but to basically rewrite the constitution to be what ever they want it to be. As they did it right before the midterms, it's going to juice the Left and make it harder for the Right to retake the house and senate. Same way the Trump getting elected tripled the failing New York Times subscription revenue.
And hey no joke, if you want to go read an incredible writer whose politcal views align almost exactly with yours, (from what I can tell) go read Sanction by Roman McCoy. Good luck finding a copy of it though.
No plan, no vision, no understanding, no hope.
What are you talking about?